The cost of being on-line

Joost Schuttelaar EMAIL HIDDEN
Fri Jun 24 15:24:23 CEST 2011


Charcoal!?! :) Coal is ten times worse...

1) sun/wind & responsible hydro
2) nuclear
3) good biomass
4) gas
5) most biomass
6) oil
7) coal
666) biomass replacing food sources

We need 1-3 in the near future.

-- 

Joost Schuttelaar
The Hague, NL

On Jun 24, 2011, at 15:06 , Romain / rXg wrote:

> Open question cause i m just curious about what think the barians :
> What is worse for you Nuclear or Charcoal Energy ?
>  
> :)
>  
>  
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Peter Korsten <peter at severity-one.com> wrote:
> Since there are quite a few environmentally conscious people on this
> list, who also use the modern internet-based tools at our disposal, the
> following link is food for thought:
> 
> http://vimeo.com/25329849
> 
> - Peter
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Romain
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar




More information about the music-bar mailing list