The cost of being on-line
Joost Schuttelaar
EMAIL HIDDEN
Fri Jun 24 15:24:23 CEST 2011
Charcoal!?! :) Coal is ten times worse...
1) sun/wind & responsible hydro
2) nuclear
3) good biomass
4) gas
5) most biomass
6) oil
7) coal
666) biomass replacing food sources
We need 1-3 in the near future.
--
Joost Schuttelaar
The Hague, NL
On Jun 24, 2011, at 15:06 , Romain / rXg wrote:
> Open question cause i m just curious about what think the barians :
> What is worse for you Nuclear or Charcoal Energy ?
>
> :)
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Peter Korsten <peter at severity-one.com> wrote:
> Since there are quite a few environmentally conscious people on this
> list, who also use the modern internet-based tools at our disposal, the
> following link is food for thought:
>
> http://vimeo.com/25329849
>
> - Peter
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
>
>
> --
> Romain
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
More information about the music-bar
mailing list