The cost of being on-line

Ron West EMAIL HIDDEN
Fri Jun 24 15:50:45 CEST 2011


1. Dilithium crystals

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Joost Schuttelaar
<joost at joostschuttelaar.nl> wrote:
> Charcoal!?! :) Coal is ten times worse...
>
> 1) sun/wind & responsible hydro
> 2) nuclear
> 3) good biomass
> 4) gas
> 5) most biomass
> 6) oil
> 7) coal
> 666) biomass replacing food sources
>
> We need 1-3 in the near future.
>
> --
>
> Joost Schuttelaar
> The Hague, NL
>
> On Jun 24, 2011, at 15:06 , Romain / rXg wrote:
>
>> Open question cause i m just curious about what think the barians :
>> What is worse for you Nuclear or Charcoal Energy ?
>>
>> :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Peter Korsten <peter at severity-one.com> wrote:
>> Since there are quite a few environmentally conscious people on this
>> list, who also use the modern internet-based tools at our disposal, the
>> following link is food for thought:
>>
>> http://vimeo.com/25329849
>>
>> - Peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> music-bar mailing list
>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Romain
>> _______________________________________________
>> music-bar mailing list
>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>



More information about the music-bar mailing list