Matrix
Michael Zacherl
EMAIL HIDDEN
Fri Aug 1 11:15:55 CEST 2008
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Martin Naef wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Michael Zacherl wrote:
>> Originally we were discussing sort of an uber-filter, i.e. freely
>> configurable filter poles with morphable configurations.
>> This would require a bunch of inverting VCAs, at least at the
>> matrix's
>> I/Os which is 2x16 on a 16x16 matrix.
>
> In that case, I think digital is *not* the way to go. With filter
> topologies, you'll want to keep the option for feedback paths. The
> latency introduced by the AD/DA stages will kill that option.
erm ... yup - you are right. :-( Thanks for pointing that out.
Michael. (dismissed in humility)
--
noise chaser: http://blauwurf.at
More information about the music-bar
mailing list