Matrix

[Martin Naef]

Michael,

Michael Zacherl wrote:
> Originally we were discussing sort of an uber-filter, i.e. freely  
> configurable filter poles with morphable configurations.
> This would require a bunch of inverting VCAs, at least at the matrix's  
> I/Os which is 2x16 on a 16x16 matrix.

In that case, I think digital is *not* the way to go. With filter 
topologies, you'll want to keep the option for feedback paths. The 
latency introduced by the AD/DA stages will kill that option.

Bye
Martin

-- 
http://www.navisto.ch
http://www.myspace.com/navisto