Pro 3

[Michael Zacherl]

Besides the look of it I just like the Pro 2’s configuration better!
The digital FM-capable 4-Oscillator/Dual-Filter Setup just has more appeal to me than the new 2+1 architecture.
IMO also the paraphonic mode becomes less useful this way.
I really do like analogue Oscillators, but I also appreciate the advantages of digital sound sources (FM!).
m.

> On 21.01.2020, at 02:23, James Coplin <james at ticalun.net> wrote:
> 
> I really dont like the look of the Pro 3. Not that it should matter but the Pro 2 is so classy and classic looking. Really solid build quality. The Pro 3 looks like a toy.
> 
> I've played all the Dave Smith instruments including the old Sequential stuff and other than the Pro 2, I haven't liked any of his new stuff. The Pro 2 is a solid work horse and I save surprisingly few quibbles with it. The CV ins and outs are amazingly easy to use and work flawlessly for me.
> 
> James
> On Jan 20, 2020, at 2:38 PM, Tony Scharf <tony.scharf at outlook.com> wrote:
> I’m thinking part of it was to get the sequential name on the back as, I believe, the Pro 2 still was under Dave Smith.  
> 
> Anyway, I’m planning on picking up a pro 2 second hand when I find one at the right price.
> 
> From: music-bar <music-bar-bounces at lists.music-bar.org> on behalf of Niall Munnelly <niall.munnelly at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 2:13:18 PM
> To: Music-bar <music-bar at lists.music-bar.org>
> Subject: Re: Pro 3
>  
> I also prefer the 2, overall; I’m guessing that sales had effectively stopped, and here we go.
> 
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:36 PM Michael Zacherl <mubar05 at blauwurf.at> wrote:
> 
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir_k6E17_Ps
> 
> Haven’t had the time to view more, but just from the look of it I did like the Pro 2’s design better.
> But that’s most likely just me.