Kurzweil k2500 & k2600

[EMAIL HIDDEN]

I had a 2500XS years back and really enjoyed it. Loading sounds into  
it was painfully slow though. I honestly don't see a use for one with  
current offerings of software equivilants unless you want the hardware  
experience.

Larry

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 6, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Tony Scharf <noisetheorem at gmail.com> wrote:

> Go for the 2600 if you can.  It has the KDFX as standard, and you
> would be missing out without that.
>
> I used to have a K2000 a while back.   I really loved programming with
> VAST.    You can really get in and do some amazing things.
>
> The polyphony is low by modern standards,  but the sound is still
> current and unique in my opinion.
>
> Tony
>
> On 6/6/09, James R. Coplin <james at ticalun.net> wrote:
>> Anyone have an opinion on either of these?  I see that the K2500  
>> racks are
>> going super cheap these days.  I'm mainly considering the 88 key  
>> version
>> though as my old Roland A-80 is getting a little long in tooth.
>>
>> James R. Coplin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> music-bar mailing list
>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>>
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar