Liquid Mix impressions and result

[punkdISCO]

Hi Martin

Very interesting reading.  Thanks for the writeup..

"It's not the big massive "wow!" factor, but it just works, and works well"

I have read that some people feel the UAD emulations are 'better' however,
other people then jump in on the discussion (people with current experience
of the actually hardware v the LM v the UAD); their view is that the LM is
more accurate and true to the physical hardware whilst the UAD puts a slight
marketing spin on their emulations by being very true to the hardware but at
the same time, flattering or exaggerating certain aspects.  I actually kind
of like the UAD approach (if it is true) as I always look for processors
that colour the sound.

But however you look at it, even comparing the LM to the actual hardware,
the differences are so minutely small, you just would never tell the
difference, certainly in context of a mix.  And if you then consider that
Martin has 32 channels of EQ/Comp processing using 20 EQs and 40 compressors
emulations, all for £250 (used), then this is an insanely small amount of
money to spend.

PS: the track sounds great..

Paul
London
www.punkdisco.co.uk
Banned by YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EvlOpBe0xU
"thats mental! and rather fkin ace too! cheers! dick subhumans"