DSLR
Gert van Santen
EMAIL HIDDEN
Tue Apr 1 15:52:01 CEST 2008
Martin Naef schreef:
> Hi Gert
>
> Gert van Santen wrote:
>>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to bash a perfectly ok lens. I just
>>> find that you can get better value for money if you're prepared to
>>> change lenses once in a while...
>> If you start off with a 17-50, you can make most of your
>> pictures. :-)
>
> I'd say, that's about 2/3 of my pictures. Anything with people in them,
> I quite like a somewhat longer reach. Say a 70-200mm F4, the new Sigma
> 50-150 F2.8 or the Canon 55-250 if money is an issue...
I am hoping to get a good tele with IS somewhere this or next year...
> I kind of wished I could start all over again today - there's a much
> better choice of lenses than when I started.
Hmm, I'm still very happy with the lenses I own. The "worst" is
the Sigma (or Tamron) 28-300. Good enough for working outside,
though, when the weather is nice. I do think, however, that I'm
less concerned with things like distortion in lenses than you are ;-)
--
:-)
G e r t v a n S a n t e n
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
www.gertvansanten.nl
www.myspace.com/pbalris
www.waveworld.tv
More information about the music-bar
mailing list