Patchbay woes...
Andrew Tarpinian
andrewtarpinian at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 20:07:24 CEST 2014
Yea I looked at those but I need something enclosed to hide cable clutter, be on the floor and create another table surface to put some bit of gear on top.
On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Tony Scharf <noisetheorem at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I've got two of these for my racks:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/On-Stage-Stands-RS7030-OnStage-Stand/dp/B000CD1R84/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1396628402&sr=8-1&keywords=rack+stand
>
> They are actually very well built and stable. I have them on top of my Ikea desk. Its easy to get in and connect things when I have to and heat is definitely not a problem. easier to clean/dust as well.
>
> Tony
>
> From: andrewtarpinian at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Patchbay woes...
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 19:19:45 -0400
> To: music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>
> Good to know as far as cables. I may try a pair as my monitors are a hummin’
>
> Looking at rack furniture makes me sad inside. Doge says: Such high price, so low quality, wow
>
> I think I’m gonna do a double Ikea Rast on casters, will look better and cost a fraction.
>
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Tony Scharf <noisetheorem at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I like that patchbay! Mine is the old kind that you have to flip the cards on to change. I'd prefer the switches. If I ever come across $400, I might replace mine.
>
> On balanced v/s unbalanced: I don't think balanced cables will earn you anything in a small studio environment. If you had very long cable runs it can be worth it (100ft or more), but nothing that you are going to have in a small home studio is going to require that kind of length.
>
> My studio is very quiet and its been running on the same cheap HOSA cables for the better part of 10 years. In that time, I've probably had 4 go bad.
>
> Tony
>
>
> From: andrewtarpinian at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Patchbay woes...
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:33:00 -0400
> To: music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>
> Yea this at first made sense, and made me understand the concept better. But then I realized that for my situation that would not really work out like that for me, and that made me more confused. The ADA8000 looks interesting, I wonder why there are not more like this at that price point? It’s nice to be able to use the digital io of your interface without having a big digital mixer. Though I think this may not be so great for me because you are then so reliant on the computer to route.
>
> I was looking at this patchbay since it’s very easy to change t he modes (switches)
> http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/SPatchPlus/
>
> What does everyone think about balanced vs unbalanced cables? I have only used unbalanced up until now, though I do have gear that is balanced. I’m thinking of getting them for my monitors since I am getting hum in them currently. Since I am going to be buying a shit load of cables should I just buy all balanced?
>
> Thanks for everyones help.
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:29 AM, Tony Scharf <entropymagnet at noisetheorem.com> wrote:
>
> >>Far as i know in theory “A patch bay is well configured if it has nothing patched on the front … “
>
> I certainly don't agree with the common wisdom. It works if you have as much gear as you have mixer channels and you have a default setup that you always want to have, but it also hides what's going on behind the rack. The entire point of a patch bay, in my opinion, is to bring those connections to one place up front and center where you can figure out what's going where just by looking at it. I treat my rig very similarly to how I treat my modular synth so any default is going to end up highly modified anyway.
>
> Tony
>
> From: xtechcode at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Patchbay woes...
> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:13:20 +0200
> To: music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>
>
> I remember talking with Joost about Pachtbay …
> Far as i know in theory “A patch bay is well configured if it has nothing patched on the front … “
> if you have a cable patched on the front it s just to redirect the signal to something else than your default routing …
>
> I m using a patch bay with adat 8000 and sound card (8in/out)
>
> I tried to set it in a kind of logical way ( also using sticker can be useful to know what is what) ..
> See below, maybe my drawing will inspire you :)
>
>
>
>
> < /div>
>
> -From TOP at the back 1 to 8 I plugged the instruments i mostly used then they are routed in // to the Bottom from 1 to 8 which are routed to my input sound card (rme).
> -From TOP at the back 13 to 20 I plugged the instruments i mostly used then they are routed in // to the Bottom from 13 to 20 which are routed to the Adat in
> -From TOP at the back 9 to 12 I plugged 4 outputs from the sound card ( nb: 9 and 10 are routed // to the bottom 9 and 10 )
> -From TOP at the back from 21 to 24 I plugged 4 outputs from Adat out
> -From Bottom at the back 9 and 10 are routed to minidisk in ( yes i still have a minidisk :-)
> -From Bottom at the back 23 is routed to my Guitar pedal fx
> -From Bottom at the back 24 is routed to my guitar rack fx
>
> nb: Bottom 11, 12, 21, 22 : I don’t used …
>
>
>
>
>
> INSTRUMENTS INSTRUMENTS
> / | | | | | \ \ AUDIO OUT / / | | | | \ ADAT OUT
> T O P : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> Bottom : 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24
> \ | | | | | | / \ / &nb sp; \ \ | | | / / / | |
> - Soundcard RME in - - MD - - ADAT IN - -RP10- - Rocktron -
>
>
>
> Romain
>
>
>
> On 02 Apr 2014, at 23:56, Andrew Tarpinian <andrewtarpinian at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Getting my first patchbay(s).
>
> I can patch a modular synth no prob, but getting my head around ordering and setting up a patchbay, really makes it hurt :(
>
> Is it just me?
>
> Also i’m dreading actually figuring out how many cables I need to have EVERYTHING hooked up.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
>
> _______________________________________________ music-bar mailing list music-bar at lists.music-bar.org http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis tinfo/music-bar_______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
> _______________________________________________ music-bar mailing list music-bar at lists.music-bar.org http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> < /div>
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
>
> _______________________________________________ music-bar mailing list music-bar at lists.music-bar.org http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.music-bar.org/pipermail/music-bar/attachments/20140404/e9aa88a2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the music-bar
mailing list