Well don't I feel silly...

[Marc Nostromo [M-.-n]]

" changed the feedback circuit such that the filter becomes more
controllable and could auto-oscillate while keeping its byte."

Ho, it's a digital one :)

2013/1/23 Tony Hardie-Bick <tony at entity.net>:
> On 23/01/13 16:49, Romain / rXg wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Jay, It will be very interresting to read Tony about the filter
>> design  even if i won t be able to understand everything yet :)
>
>
> the older one distorts more easily (less signal required), and also,
> when the resonance is way up and it's oscillating (but the oscillation
> is disturbed or made unintelligable), the oscillation amplitudes are
> not much louder than the signal itself; the two are more equal, so
> the filter is more musically useful at extreme settings, than the later
> version.
>
> there are also some very subtle differences that arise from the different
> circuits that are used, and it's difficult to describe these in objective
> terms, as a listener, but history has shown that the first circuit is
> more widely appreciated
>
> here is a particularly good article about the minibrute filter design
> (thanks mz for pointing this out):
>
> http://is.gd/minibrute
>
> (search for the paragraph that starts "Therefore I packed three VCFs")
>
> Tony (HB)
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar



-- 
http://marc-nostromo.com