Yamaha RM1X

Marc Nostromo [M-.-n] marc.nostromo at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 20:25:46 CET 2013


My biggest gripe with my MD was the fact that the song structure in
pattern necessairely combines all the track elements together. For
example if I have a 4 bar loop and I want to continue only BD & snare
for another 12, I need first to duplicate the whole pattern and then
delete everything I didn't need anymore. I found it very combersome.

Do they address that in any ways these days ?
/M

2013/1/14 Andrew Tarpinian <andrewtarpinian at gmail.com>:
> I like the workflow and having the keyboard attached really makes it a cohesive unit. I suppose it's all the same with a midi controller, but you miss out on things like the LED's above the keys and the joystick and, well the other mental benefits of integration.
>
> It's not super complex, I just find it really, really fast and straight forward. I don't even have to think how to operate it.
>
> The octatrack I still have not gotten to grips with, I really think it's too complex for its own good, and it's weird because it's the same company.
>
> On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "Marc Nostromo [M-.-n]" <marc.nostromo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> I think the monomachine keyboard is the best seq for purely ease of use.
>>
>> You mean because it has a keyboard or just because you like the
>> monomachine's workflow ?
>> _______________________________________________
>> music-bar mailing list
>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar



-- 
http://marc-nostromo.com


More information about the music-bar mailing list