M@ and The Dweez'

Martin Naef EMAIL HIDDEN
Mon Oct 10 22:22:38 CEST 2011


On 10.10.2011 10:10, Peter Korsten wrote:
> So how have things developed since the last time I looked into a 56K
> data book in the 1990s? Jay used to be really into DSP, but he appears
> to have shifted his interest to small, embedded boards.

Good question. Last time I checked, the 56K family looked rather 
stagnant. But that's been a while...

> And how relevant are the developments with GPUs? Nvidia will happily
> sell you a PCI-e board that is basically a re-branded graphics card for
> an amount of money that has your jaw drop and your teeth fall out. But

Well, there's a bit more than that in the Tesla cards - mostly on the 
side of improved reliability (e.g. thermal management and ECC memory) 
and service contracts. But yes, you're paying A LOT more for the same 
chip with different firmware...

> perhaps you don't want a GTX 580 with its heat production in a
> professional audio system...

You could always get a smaller, passively cooled version. But having 
looked into the architecture, I'm not so sure you'd really want to use 
the current generation GPUs for the majority of audio tasks. For a 
start, they're really not built for low-latency operation. And 
secondary, they're essentially vector machines that need *massive* data 
parallelism (ten-thousands of elements is best...). If you run huge FFTs 
or software samplers with thousands of voices, the GPU would be your 
friend. But who does?

Martin



More information about the music-bar mailing list