London/UK violence

[Peter Korsten]

Op 11-8-2011 18:06, K9 Kai Niggemann schreef:

> The looming question remains: cui bono?

Moreover, it's as easy to keep something secret in Washington as it is 
to print counterfeit money in a glass box in the middle of Times Square.

I mean, this is the country of which a staggering amount of diplomatic 
communications were published on the internet; the country where they 
couldn't keep it a secret that their president ordered a break-in at the 
opposition's headquarters; a country where they couldn't keep the secret 
of how to make an atomic bomb.

And in this same country, they managed to keep it a secret that the 
government decided to put all sorts of secret and nefarious activities 
in the most easy to secure location: Lower Manhattan? And they mined the 
building, just in case that some loony ragheads decided to fly a couple 
of airliners into the neighbouring twin towers?

Come off it. Go pull the other one. Nobody is that stupid, not even the 
Bush administration.

Of course the US government is doing all sorts of nefarious things, but 
the idea that they have their top-secret facility in Lower bloody 
Manhattan, and that they blew up WTC7 to hide the fact, is so completely 
out of whack, that indeed, I don't believe. I also don't believe in 
flying pigs, God, the faeries or any other things for which there's no 
concrete evidence, let alone proof.

I'm willing to believe that the USA facilitated and employed torture in 
the aftermath of the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions, and that an Arab 
life didn't (doesn't?) count for much. But I'm not willing to believe 
something that makes absolutely no sense.

One question: why? Why blow up WTC7?

- Peter