New track - Hopeful
Peter Korsten
EMAIL HIDDEN
Sun Oct 11 23:49:03 CEST 2009
Mikael Hansson schreef:
> I've tried the lyrics before music method a few times and it was very
> easy putting the music together, but the hard part is coming up with
> good lyrics when english isnt't your native tongue, often it just sounds
> silly.
As somebody who speaks more English these days than his native language,
the only way you can learn this is by immersing yourself in English.
I first started getting educated in English at age 13, in the first year
of secondary education. When I graduated six years later, my final score
was 8/10, so pretty good, but largely based on my ability to read,
listen and understand, more than literature, grammar or spoken English.
Yet, what really thought me the English I speak and write today, was
spending all my time on the internet. In the early nineties, when there
wasn't the world-wide web, there were just mailing lists and Usenet
news. Only text, practically all of it English, and most of it from
native (read: American) speakers.
Then, what helps, is reading English books. Try the science
fiction/fantasy writer Jack Vance, for example: it'll be a challenge to
anyone's vocabulary.
And then you arrive at a point where you can write 'quintessentially'
without the spell checker protesting.
But I understand what you mean. There's an example of it, the song
'Ruthless queen' by the Dutch prog rock band Kayak:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=NL&hl=nl&v=vVvtCy9DmIs
The song is gorgeous, but the lyrics are stunted, and now I'm being
friendly. It's typical that, if you search for the lyrics, nobody really
agrees on what's being sung: 'lapped in luxury' or 'leapt in luxury'?
'You would steal the treasure of my dreams' or 'you are still the
treasure of my dreams'?
On the other hand, a certain group of four people from your own country
made it big with English-language songs, even though they weren't native
speakers. So it's not just the command of the language that counts, but
the whole package.
Which brings me to your song. Production-wise, there's little, if
anything, to complain about. It's very well put together, and obviously
a great deal of care has gone into it.
But I agree with other posters before that it is perhaps a little tame,
perhaps unambitious. It's a song with which you won't fail
spectacularly, but will we see it in the charts one day? I don't know.
Perhaps for that, you'd need something that makes you think: "hey, wait
a minute."
That, obviously, is the whole point, and the most difficult part of it all.
- Peter
More information about the music-bar
mailing list