Retuning?

[Martin Naef]

Tony Hardie-Bick wrote:
> Martin Naef wrote:
>> That reads like an abstract of an arbitrary scientific paper, except  
>> that you gave it away with the last couple of words.
>>
>> Not that yours would make significantly less sense. ;-)
> 
> Wasn't an entire spoof paper written in this way sometime recently?

There are various spoof papers floating about, some of them passed 
peer-review. So much about scientific excellence...

Martin