Retuning?

[Martin Naef]

Gert van Santen wrote:
> Funny that everyone completely crushes this idea. Not that I 
> completely believe it, but I wouldn't be surprised if there would 
> be at least an element of truth in it.

I think as in so many of these things, there might be very small core of 
truth (like that we generally react differently to various tunings), but 
totally drowned in pseudo-scientific b***s***. I had a look at his 
web-page. When he explains how all these numbers nicely recombine and 
are supposedly in sync, he totally forgets that our number system is 
totally arbitrary, and there's no particularly good reason why we're 
counting in a base-10 system other than that we've done this for some 
time already... Change that, and the theory falls apart. But if it makes 
him (rich) and his followers happy, more power to him...

Martin