reliability, please check

[Bill Fox]

Joost Schuttelaar wrote:
> On May 15, 2008, at 23:59 , Bill Fox wrote:
>   
>> Joost Schuttelaar wrote:
>>     
>>> Can some of you check that from the last 24 hours you didn't miss any
>>> of these e-mails?
>>> http://lists.music-bar.org/pipermail/music-bar/2008-May/thread.html
>>> Just checking if the list is reliable right now.
>>>       
>> Joost,
>> ALERT!  You have the To: field populated by the original sender.
>>     
> Huh? The To: field is music-bar at lists.music-bar.org here
Sorry, Joost.  I must be on drugs.  I got it bass-ackwards.  Here's a 
sample header from the "Unverified" folder:

Date:       Thu May 15 19:04:44 CDT 2008
Sender:     "Peter Korsten"<peter at severity-one.com>
To:  "Music-bar"<music-bar at lists.music-bar.org>
Subject:     Re: Some videos listed

With Peter listed as the sender, (what happened to the From: field?) I'm 
fairly certain that Spam Arrest thinks that Peter has sent me a 
message.  Since Peter is not in my allowed-to-send list, his message is 
stuck in limbo until he responds to the challenge message that Spam 
Arrest sends to unknown senders.  (Peter: Can you confirm that Spam 
Arrest has sent you the challenge message?)

I have already placed music-bar at lists.music-bar.org into the "mailing 
lists that are allowed to send" list so if you change how you populate 
the sender (or From or Reply-to ?) field(s) to the list address, I'll 
start getting all list messages and other list members will not be 
bothered by challenge messages from Spam Arrest.  Spam Arrest must be 
made to think that list messages are from the list 
(music-bar at lists.music-bar.org) and not from the original senders.  What 
are you using to populate the Reply-to field?

Shouldn't I be in the To field and not the list?  I don't know how these 
things work.  Sheesh.  Sometimes it's frustrating not being an IT  person...

Cheers,

Bill