New Record
Mikael Hansson
EMAIL HIDDEN
Tue Mar 4 19:14:46 CET 2008
Tony Scharf wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Niall Munnelly <aleph at aleph-null.net> wrote:
>> Is that with Massive set to the performance or render
>> quality mode?
>>
>
> Massive has 3 quality modes. I set it to the middle one as a
> compromise, because I cant hear the difference between it and high
> quality mode, but I save about 5% of my CPU per instance, depending on
> the patch. even at eco quality, the only artifact I really here is a
> bit of fuzziness in some of the patches - like there is some kind of
> dithering or something adding a small amount of white noise.
I loaded up 10 instances of Massive in Cubase PC and made this little
piece which is quite dense...
<http://hem.bredband.net/musicmaker/massivetest.mp3>
I had all Massive's set to the 'Ultra' quality setting. A C2Quad at
2.4GHz and 4GB ram used around 30 % according to Cubase's meter and
around 22% in Windows taskmanager.
I'd guess making a whole track won't be a problem unless you make very
very dense tracks :)
/Micke
More information about the music-bar
mailing list