w00t powah !
Michael Zacherl
EMAIL HIDDEN
Wed Jul 23 14:15:03 CEST 2008
On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:08 PM, M-.-n wrote:
>
> It's still only a question of "mesuring" right ?
right! And how that data is displayed. Logic for instance shows a bar
for each core.
> Live can use all cores
that I know. I'm looking for inforation how good it is in that.
On my MBP with it's two 2.6GHz cores MacOS X itself never reports a
utilisation above roughly 120%.
That's very application and OS dependend.
Just now, while I type this, with that HD-video rendering, the entire
cpu load displayed is at 198% here.
Multithreading, loadbalancing etc. stil has much room for improvement.
Also smooth I/O handling. Regardless what system it is.
After that GHz race and adding more and more cores to the systems
there's a good reason why vendors start to finally get it and
(hopefully) began to focus on the utilisation aspect!
E.g.: http://www.macrumors.com/2008/06/10/mac-os-x-snow-leopard-features-and-parallel-computing/
;-) Michael.
>
> for sure but at the moment I only use 10% of the 'whole'.
>
> Michael Zacherl a écrit :
>> well ... I put it differently: how much advantage you can draw from
>> your four cores?
>> (some software/systems see all cores as 100% others see a single core
>> of all of them as 100% - hence 400% in your case)
--
keep your ears open: http://blauwurf.at
More information about the music-bar
mailing list