<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 17.04.2022, at 08:46, Jammer <<a href="mailto:jammer@jammer.biz" class="">jammer@jammer.biz</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 18px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; float: none; display: inline !important;" class="">I mean, how can anyone big up a language like JS that is so "good" they had to make another entire language/interpreter to shove between the developer and "the code". TypeScripts very existence is a testament to how horrible it is to work with large JS projects.</span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">
<meta charset="UTF-8" class=""><div>As the years go by I remain more and more convinced that the adoption of Javascript has been pushed in order to create job security and as well to ensure there is a much, much larger footprint for exploits than would be available with better technologies, such as Lua, etc.</div><div><br class=""></div><div>Its like, all those VBA devs took their lessons learned and built themselves a job security platform, version 2.0.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class="">j.<br class="">—<br class="">Jay Vaughan<br class=""><a href="mailto:ibisum@gmail.com" class="">ibisum@gmail.com</a><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<br class=""></body></html>