<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
"my pair of lovingly maintained Proteus 2000 units" :-P<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/31/22 2:14 PM, Niall Munnelly
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA++9Xrrfyz0P8K-z_uUyTcXPYMQtJM64rBfCXLvw7K+FDXn3XQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">If it’s accurate, say “Proteus 2000s,” which may
not be correct (Proteuses 2000), but it’s a hell of a lot
easier. ;)</div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:15
PM Peter Korsten <<a href="mailto:peter@severity-one.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">peter@severity-one.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey Niall,<br>
<br>
> Stereo’s good if you’re using synths with onboard
effects or pad <br>
> machines like your Proteus - or if you like the way
your synth handles <br>
> stereo (sequenced or otherwise modulated panning
effects, eg). But so <br>
> many sounds just aren’t suited to stereo “sourcing,”
and is better <br>
> handled as mono and managed downstream in whatever’s
doing the mixing. <br>
> There also a lot to be said for having one thing do the
job of mixing <br>
> and positioning in the stereo field, rather than
tweaking each <br>
> individual device.<br>
<br>
That's what I was thinking. It ought to be mentioned,
though, that I <br>
have two Proteuses (Protei?), with quite a variety of
different ROMs. <br>
Also, E-Mu effects tend to be weak, as Tony humorously
pointed out of <br>
Facebook. But I can't see myself hook up a synth with 128
voices with <br>
sounds as diverse as dance, hip-hop, vintage synths and
organs, and <br>
ethnic instruments, over a mono cable.<br>
<br>
Almost everything in the list in my reply to Jay is from the
1990s, so <br>
they come with built-in effects. But those may not be very
good, and it <br>
just muddles things up.<br>
<br>
What I forgot to mention, though, is that I want a couple
more synths, <br>
notably a MicroWave 2 and a Super Bass Station or maybe a
Pulse+. So <br>
then I'd be looking at more like 24 inputs.<br>
<br>
> Of course a lot of this also has a lot to do with where
your audio is <br>
> going and what you do with it - are you automating your
mix with a <br>
> DAW, or playing a mixer (hardware or software
interface), or who knows <br>
> what else. If you’re doing the heavy lifting of mixing
on your <br>
> computer, it seems to me that mono channels are your
best bet, <br>
> certainly the best use of your money.<br>
<br>
That's the basic idea.<br>
<br>
> I reckon I’m in the same camp as Jay now and when we
talked about this <br>
> here some fifteen years ago: most sources are mono, and
there’s a <br>
> reason mixers typically have lots of mono channels and
maybe two or <br>
> three stereo pairs. There are, of course, exceptions,
and for that, we <br>
> have stuff like the Speck Xtramix and other expensive
stuff, or stereo <br>
> line mixers like the Rane SM series that can be linked
via Ethernet <br>
> cables.<br>
<br>
Anything more expensive than MOTU or Presonus isn't an
option for me. <br>
The Behringer X32 rack is very interesting, but I'm afraid
that <br>
expanding it will be an issue, because it'll have to be done
via AES50, <br>
which nobody uses except Behringer and Midas (which they
own).<br>
<br>
> I’ve seen a lot of marketing buzz about the UDO Super
Six’s binaural <br>
> mode, and, while I’m sure it sounds pretty amazing in
the right <br>
> context, I’m not sure it justifies any additional price
it may introduce.<br>
<br>
That's definitely not on my radar. I've got a silly amount
of sound <br>
producing hardware and software already.<br>
<br>
One thing I've been considering is chucking an ADAT card in
my PC, and <br>
use converters. I'd have to remove a PCIe card, for example
that <br>
Thunderbolt card that doesn't work. That also limits my
choices, unless <br>
I purchase a new motherboard... and I'm a bit done with
spending money <br>
unnecessarily.<br>
<br>
- Peter<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
music-bar mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:music-bar@lists.music-bar.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">music-bar@lists.music-bar.org</a><br>
<a
href="http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar</a><br>
<br>
Listen to Music-Bar Radio! <<a
href="http://www.music-bar.org/radio.html"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.music-bar.org/radio.html</a>><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><span
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Yours,</span><br
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">Niall.</span></div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
music-bar mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:music-bar@lists.music-bar.org">music-bar@lists.music-bar.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar">http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar</a>
Listen to Music-Bar Radio! <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="http://www.music-bar.org/radio.html"><http://www.music-bar.org/radio.html></a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>