<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body><div><div style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Morning all<br><br>Yes, the new every 6 months thing I can relate too :(<br><br>I know I started this discussion but I'm actually very happy with live. I just find it strange that their releases have ground to a halt in the last few years..<br><br>But as people have said: live us now mature and there is only so much functionality needed...<br><br>Ta<br><br>Paul<br>London<br>www.punkdisco.co.uk</div></div><div dir="ltr"><hr><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">From: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:deeplfo@gmail.com">deeplfo</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Sent: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">09/06/2015 07:15</span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">To: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:music-bar@lists.music-bar.org">Music-bar</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Subject: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Re: Ableton Live - has it lost its mojo?</span><br><br></div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>I wonder if you are suffering from the modern age issue of having something new every 6 months :-)<br><br></div>But on your original post, I don't feel any of the Live's lackings, if you can call them that for now, are a big deal. I still love working in Live as I did from when I got my hands on version 1.5. <br><br></div>My only gripe is that I wish it wouldn't crash on me as often as it does. Even the move to 64-bit hasn't seemed to make any dent in that dept. So, I would like stability, and some more skins :-)<br><br></div>mohsen<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:53 AM, foRUMS 4 punkdISCO <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:forums@punkdisco.co.uk" target="_blank">forums@punkdisco.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid;">Hey Peter<br>
<br>
Yeah, despite the fact that I started this thread, there is nothing that feel is missing from Live with the exception of:<br>
<br>
1) naming MIDI and Audio i/o. Im scared to count the hours of my life that Ive lost trying to work out why SynthA is not working only to discover that it is audio input "27" and not "28" (ditto with MIDI).<br>
<br>
2) More flexible window arrangement. I actually did not consider this one until I saw how Bitwig does window management..<br>
<br>
I guess I should not grumble and just make music :)<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
London<br>
<a href="http://www.punkdisco.co.uk" target="_blank">www.punkdisco.co.uk</a><br>
<br>
> Maybe the software is getting mature? Perhaps it's a bit like Windows:<br>
> it's been 20 years now since Windows 95, and most things that got people<br>
> excited (usually in the wrong way) got fixed/removed in the next version.<br>
><br>
> It could also be that most people who'd buy Live have already bought it, and<br>
> that as a result, revenue isn't as high as it used to be, so new features and<br>
> the inevitable bug fixes are relatively more expensive.<br>
><br>
> It could also be that they're a bunch of lazy sods, of course. :)<br>
><br>
> - Peter<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
music-bar mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:music-bar@lists.music-bar.org">music-bar@lists.music-bar.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar" target="_blank">http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</body></html>