<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Well, first off, I really like the interface. It took a little getting used to, but most things are exactly where you expect them to be. The application runs fast and the processing seems very transparent (to my admittedly battered ears). In using it for the last two years, I haven't had a single crash. <div><br></div><div>Also, it has some nice tools for importing audio from video files and the like (i've used that to extract audio from my youtube broadcasts in cases I forgot to record). Also, it runs very lightly in the back ground while recording. I've never had it hiccup while recording and broadcasting at the same time on the same machine. </div><div><br></div><div>Tony<br><br><div>> From: canine@waf80.de<br>> Subject: Re: Sample Editor OS X<br>> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:13:05 +0200<br>> To: music-bar@lists.music-bar.org<br>> <br>> That Sounds interesting. In my experience they are all good if they feel fast and don't crash. So what makes audition better?<br>> <br>> Sent from my phone<br>> <br>> On 20.05.2014, at 14:30, Tony Scharf <noisetheorem@outlook.com> wro<br>> te:<br>> <br>> > For what its worth, I really like Adobe Audition (which I think was cool edit before the acquisition). it's UI is a bit cluttered, but It's an awesome tool. <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> music-bar mailing list<br>> music-bar@lists.music-bar.org<br>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar<br></div></div> </div></body>
</html>