Martin<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
But how about just going ahead and designing your synth the way you imagine it? I understood that your primary motivation was having your very personal polysynth. So there's nothing stopping you from doing just that.<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>yup, I'm fully intending to, after all that's what I did with the Monowave :)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
If afterwards a lot of people want one too, I'd start worrying about the business side. If you want to keep your risk low, you can simply license the design to an established business and reap some of the benefits while accepting that somebody else might get rich (or go bankrupt...). I think this is the best way to keep doing what you consider the fun part (assuming that running your own business is not what you really wanted).</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I have been thinking about licensing it to someone. </div><div>It works for both them and me, they get a new product with practically zero R&D costs which they can sell.</div><div>I get a percentage or something and I don't have to deal with the business side of things.</div>
<div><br></div><div>That's how Tempest was going to work with Hartmann music, shame really as it seemed like a great deal for us both.</div><div><br></div><div>Paul</div></div></div>