<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>I really liked the UltraNova which has the has the same engine. I found it more aggressive than a virus, though tough to find the sweet spot. If the modulation sequencers weren't actually just preset stepped patterns, I'd get one again. As it stands, I think the miniak sounds better.<br><br><br></div><div><br>On Aug 30, 2012, at 5:03 AM, Peter Korsten <<a href="mailto:peter@severity-one.com">peter@severity-one.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="gmail_quote">2012/8/30 Marc Nostromo [M-.-n] <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc.nostromo@gmail.com" target="_blank">marc.nostromo@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<a href="http://uk.novationmusic.com/hardware-synths/mininova" target="_blank">http://uk.novationmusic.com/hardware-synths/mininova</a> <div><br></div><div>Little monophonic beast for 299UKP. Not bad at all. If they did a module out of it with pretty much everything but the keys and mike, I'd had huge gas.</div>
</blockquote><div> </div></div>Has their synthesis engine improved? Martin remarked, back in the day, that he wasn't very impressed and that he heard aliasing.<br>
<br>
- Peter
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>music-bar mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:music-bar@lists.music-bar.org">music-bar@lists.music-bar.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar">http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>