Yamaha RM1X

[Tony Scharf]

I believe so.  I have not tried. I believe you simply need to copy, go to
the other pattern, select the track and paste.  Ill give it a go when I get
home.

In the octatrack, patterns in the same bank (say the A bank) all use the
same bank of 4 parts (which are essentially kits in octatrack speak) so you
don't even have to worry about the sound assignments.

Tony


On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Marc Nostromo [M-.-n] <
marc.nostromo at gmail.com> wrote:

> can you copy a single track from one pattern to the other ?
>
> 2013/1/14 Tony Scharf <noisetheorem at gmail.com>:
> > On the octatrack, you can sequence mutes into the song.  It's also a
> fairly easy operation to copy the pattern and delete a track.  I've run it
> either way.  The octatrack also has 16 scenes you can switch to or cross
> fade.
> >
> > On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:25 PM, "Marc Nostromo [M-.-n]" <
> marc.nostromo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> My biggest gripe with my MD was the fact that the song structure in
> >> pattern necessairely combines all the track elements together. For
> >> example if I have a 4 bar loop and I want to continue only BD & snare
> >> for another 12, I need first to duplicate the whole pattern and then
> >> delete everything I didn't need anymore. I found it very combersome.
> >>
> >> Do they address that in any ways these days ?
> >> /M
> >>
> >> 2013/1/14 Andrew Tarpinian <andrewtarpinian at gmail.com>:
> >>> I like the workflow and having the keyboard attached really makes it a
> cohesive unit. I suppose it's all the same with a midi controller, but you
> miss out on things like the LED's above the keys and the joystick and, well
> the other mental benefits of integration.
> >>>
> >>> It's not super complex, I just find it really, really fast and
> straight forward. I don't even have to think how to operate it.
> >>>
> >>> The octatrack I still have not gotten to grips with, I really think
> it's too complex for its own good, and it's weird because it's the same
> company.
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:59 PM, "Marc Nostromo [M-.-n]" <
> marc.nostromo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I think the monomachine keyboard is the best seq for purely ease of
> use.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean because it has a keyboard or just because you like the
> >>>> monomachine's workflow ?
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> music-bar mailing list
> >>>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> >>>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> music-bar mailing list
> >>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> >>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://marc-nostromo.com
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> music-bar mailing list
> >> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> >> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
> > _______________________________________________
> > music-bar mailing list
> > music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> > http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>
>
>
> --
> http://marc-nostromo.com
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NoiseTheorem:
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/NoiseTheorem
SoundCloud:http://soundcloud.com/noisetheorem
BandCamp:http://noisetheorem.bandcamp.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.music-bar.org/pipermail/music-bar/attachments/20130114/25a6b6b0/attachment.html>