The cost of being on-line

[Jonny Stutters]

0. Tribble furnace

Also, what Joost said.

Jonny

On 24 Jun 2011, at 14:50, Ron West wrote:

> 1. Dilithium crystals
> 
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Joost Schuttelaar
> <joost at joostschuttelaar.nl> wrote:
>> Charcoal!?! :) Coal is ten times worse...
>> 
>> 1) sun/wind & responsible hydro
>> 2) nuclear
>> 3) good biomass
>> 4) gas
>> 5) most biomass
>> 6) oil
>> 7) coal
>> 666) biomass replacing food sources
>> 
>> We need 1-3 in the near future.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Joost Schuttelaar
>> The Hague, NL
>> 
>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 15:06 , Romain / rXg wrote:
>> 
>>> Open question cause i m just curious about what think the barians :
>>> What is worse for you Nuclear or Charcoal Energy ?
>>> 
>>> :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Peter Korsten <peter at severity-one.com> wrote:
>>> Since there are quite a few environmentally conscious people on this
>>> list, who also use the modern internet-based tools at our disposal, the
>>> following link is food for thought:
>>> 
>>> http://vimeo.com/25329849
>>> 
>>> - Peter
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> music-bar mailing list
>>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Romain
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> music-bar mailing list
>>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> music-bar mailing list
>> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
>> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> music-bar mailing list
> music-bar at lists.music-bar.org
> http://lists.music-bar.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/music-bar
>