Fri Aug 1 10:35:40 CEST 2008
Michael Zacherl wrote:
> Originally we were discussing sort of an uber-filter, i.e. freely
> configurable filter poles with morphable configurations.
> This would require a bunch of inverting VCAs, at least at the matrix's
> I/Os which is 2x16 on a 16x16 matrix.
In that case, I think digital is *not* the way to go. With filter
topologies, you'll want to keep the option for feedback paths. The
latency introduced by the AD/DA stages will kill that option.
More information about the music-bar