DSLR

[Michael Zacherl]

Hi Martin,

>
>> But dont you think that easiness/efficiency of use is greater with  
>> the wide
>> zoom area? That is the major reason for me to consider exactly the  
>> Sigma
>
> It is quite handy, certainly. I just found the results disappointing,
> and there's nothing more frustrating than coming home from a photo  
> shoot
> and finding that some of the best shots are not quite so impressive
> because of technical issues and because you were too lazy to change  
> the
> lens...

painful moments, indeed.

Let me put it this way, Martin (asking the experienced photographer):
When you're on vacation, or at last far from home - how do you decide  
what parts of your set to take with you?

>> 18-200 DC OS lens. I reckon that I will use this as my try-out lens  
>> - also to
>> see which zoom areas I use when and how much, and then later decide  
>> on some
>> better lenses.
>
> Fair enough, although I find it a bit expensive for a trial...

for Nikon the Sigma is ?409 best price while the original 18-200 VR is  
?579.
Depends where each lense has it strengths or weak points.

     Michael.

--
feed your perception: http://blauwurf.at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.music-bar.org/private.cgi/shelter-music-bar.org/attachments/20080401/be48af2a/attachment-0001.htm